Transparency in the Digital Age

[messi69]

In this complex context involving image rights after death and the use of artificial intelligence, it is possible to draw some relevant conclusions and reflections:

Ethical and Technological Limits: The case of the use of Elis Regina's image demonstrates that the application of artificial intelligence in recreations of deceased public figures involves ethical and technological dilemmas. Questions about homage versus commercial exploitation and the ability of current regulations to address these new issues are crucial.

Need for Specific Regulation : The lack of specific regulations for the use of posthumous images in advertising campaigns highlights the importance of clear and up-to-date rules. The analogy with Copyright law and the need for a legal framework to limit the use of post-mortem images are aspects to be considered.

Balancing Act : The right to image is not latvia telegram data absolute and must be weighed against other fundamental rights, such as freedom of expression and access to information. The need to balance image protection with free expression is an ongoing challenge that requires careful analysis.

The emergence of an AI-generated content label could represent a step forward in the fight against misinformation and image rights violations, but it also raises concerns about its effectiveness and manipulation. Public trust in technology and online information is a key consideration.

Interdisciplinary Discussions: The intersection between rights, technology and ethics demands interdisciplinary discussions between areas such as Law, Ethics, Technology and Communication. Finding a balance between technological innovation and the preservation of ethical values ​​is a constant challenge.

Temporality of Image Rights: The need to establish a time limit for the protection of posthumous image rights is crucial. Finding a time limit that respects the memory of deceased individuals while also allowing creative use and freedom of expression to flourish is a complex task.

Ultimately, the complexity of these issues requires a multidisciplinary approach and ongoing dialogue between legislators, regulators, technologists and society at large to ensure an appropriate balance between innovation and ethics in the use of technology and the preservation of individual rights.