Two problems with this plan:

[fomayof928@mowline]

2. Turning published data into something cool doesn't always get links.
If you're going to use data that's already been reported, it's best to have a new spin or finding to present. Journalists don't want to cover statistics they've already covered .

A great example of this is a project we کے بارے میں کیاwhy startups fail . Most of the data we used came from CB Insights.

It worked well once, so it should work again if we repackage it in a new format, right?

We used the startups on the CB Insights list, croatia number data in a handful of additional startups, and created a sexy-looking interactive node map that grouped startups together according to initial reasons.



While the material didn't fail (we picked it up by quartz, woo!), it certainly didn't live up to our expectations.



We weren't saying anything new about the data.
The original data had received so much coverage that many relevant publishers had already seen and/or published it.
But of course there are exceptions. If you're using existing data that has n'tایک ٹن کوریج حاصل کی۔, but is interesting, this can be a great approach. The key is to avoid data that has already been widely reported in the vertical you want to get coverage in.

3. It's hard to make connections with videos.
Video content can be extremely effective for viral sharing, which is great for brand awareness. But are videos great for earning links? Not so much.

When you think of viral content, videos probably come to mind – which is why you might assume that great videos can attract a lot of backlinks. The problem is that publishers rarely give proper attribution to videos . Instead of linking to the creator of the video, they simply embed the video from YouTube or link to YouTube. While a mention/link to the creator of the content is often included with a piece of static visual content, this is often not the case with videos.