If the sender has problems with diction, filler words and forming thoughts on the fly
Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2025 4:29 am
The process of composing a text allows you to think over the idea from all sides and present it correctly, in a pure and correct form.
A voice message, which should also be specific and concise, can turn into an essay-reasoning, diluted with mumbling, stuttering and other stupidities.
In which cases are voices OK?
1. When the recipient, during an operational activity or dialogue, hong kong telegram expects an answer to a question from you, some detailed information - it is important for him, first of all, to receive the information as quickly as possible. For this case, if it is most convenient for you to send a voice message, then there will be no confusion.
Okay case, when a person's work is blocked because it depends on certain information
2. If it is necessary to provide some detailed information during a dialogue and explain something to a person when this information is important to him, but it is inconvenient to call him.
3. If you add an intro text "Vasily, I have such and such a situation in the project, I want to know your advice, please answer when you have time. I will explain the details in the voice message, thank you!".
This is already OK + you give the person an understanding of what you expect from him and when, and he already understands the importance of this task.
4. If the recipient is your personal assistant, whose task is to unload you as much as possible and help solve all your problems and tasks. The sender/boss for him is a person to whom you always have to react. I emphasize that the relationship between the client and the contractor does not fall into this category.
5. If your relationship with your partner has developed historically in such a way that the conversation is comfortable for both parties and both partners know that no one is pushing the envelope, but that everything is always clear and to the point.
A voice message, which should also be specific and concise, can turn into an essay-reasoning, diluted with mumbling, stuttering and other stupidities.
In which cases are voices OK?
1. When the recipient, during an operational activity or dialogue, hong kong telegram expects an answer to a question from you, some detailed information - it is important for him, first of all, to receive the information as quickly as possible. For this case, if it is most convenient for you to send a voice message, then there will be no confusion.
Okay case, when a person's work is blocked because it depends on certain information
2. If it is necessary to provide some detailed information during a dialogue and explain something to a person when this information is important to him, but it is inconvenient to call him.
3. If you add an intro text "Vasily, I have such and such a situation in the project, I want to know your advice, please answer when you have time. I will explain the details in the voice message, thank you!".
This is already OK + you give the person an understanding of what you expect from him and when, and he already understands the importance of this task.
4. If the recipient is your personal assistant, whose task is to unload you as much as possible and help solve all your problems and tasks. The sender/boss for him is a person to whom you always have to react. I emphasize that the relationship between the client and the contractor does not fall into this category.
5. If your relationship with your partner has developed historically in such a way that the conversation is comfortable for both parties and both partners know that no one is pushing the envelope, but that everything is always clear and to the point.